The Litigation Boutique LLC
303-578-2833
  • Home
  • About
    • Leah P. VanLandschoot
    • Ruth A. McLeod
    • Jonny Campbell
  • Practice Areas
    • Employment Law
    • Civil Litigation
    • Discrimination
    • Employment Trade Secrets
  • Blog
  • Contact
The Litigation Boutique LLC
303-578-2833
  • Home
  • About
    • Leah P. VanLandschoot
    • Ruth A. McLeod
    • Jonny Campbell
  • Practice Areas
    • Employment Law
    • Civil Litigation
    • Discrimination
    • Employment Trade Secrets
  • Blog
  • Contact

Real Disputes Need Lawyers Who Understand The Fight

  1. Home
  2.  » 
  3. Firm News
  4.  » 
  5. Noncompete language is not always fair

Noncompete language is not always fair

On Behalf of The Litigation Boutique LLC | Feb 8, 2019 | Firm News

In the modern workplace, noncompete agreements are an accepted part of doing business for many employees. Employers often include some form of noncompete clause in their employment contracts, whether it is practical or even legal.

For many employees, the prospect of landing a job that they want or need is so enticing that they sign a contract they do not fully understand, especially when it comes to noncompete clauses. After all, not everyone is already thinking about a potential job after the job offer they just received.

Unfortunately, as the notion of remaining with a single employer for the bulk of one’s career grows outdated, employees must scrutinize noncompete clauses. In many instances, employers may include noncompete language so all-encompassing that an employee faces difficulty finding a job they can legally accept if they choose to leave.

Understanding scope and duration

In broad terms, courts allow employers to include noncompete language in a contract as long as it has a reasonable scope and duration. This means that it cannot restrict an employee from seeking reasonably unrelated employment, and the restriction may only last for a reasonable amount of time.

In practice, however, some companies include wildly impractical noncompete language in contracts knowing that an employee is unlikely to use their own time and resources to fight it. This sort of 800-pound gorilla behavior is not acceptable and should not go unchallenged.

While standards shift from region to region and within individual industries, most courts acknowledge the validity of agreements that restrict competing employment for two years after an employee leaves. The acceptable boundaries within individual industries are specific and require individual consideration.

Geographical restrictions are more difficult to navigate in the digital age, but they are still important. It may make sense for an employer to restrict competition in a given sales region, but not an entire country, for instance.

Protect your rights for the sake of all workers

Fighting back against unfair noncompete terms not only helps protect your own rights and dignity, it shores up the rights of other employees who do not have the resources or internal motivation to fight professional mistreatment.

Do not hesitate to use the strength of the law to push for fair terms in any employment contract, for your own sake and to improve the working lives of others around you in the workplace.

Recent Posts

  • Signs of workplace discrimination to watch out for
  • How Colorado limits non-compete agreements for higher earners
  • Do you qualify for a constructive discharge claim?
  • Can Denver employers fire you without cause?
  • 4 ways to negotiate a severance agreement in an at-will state

Archives

Categories

RSS Feed

Subscribe To This Blog’s Feed

Request A Confidential Case Evaluation

Contact The Firm

Office Phone

303-578-2833

Office Address

The Litigation Boutique LLC
78 West 11th Avenue
Denver, CO 80204

Denver Office

Social Media

  • Follow
  • Follow
  • Follow
Review The Firm

© 2026 The Litigation Boutique LLC • All Rights Reserved

Disclaimer | Site Map | Privacy Policy | Business Development Solutions by FindLaw